Search for: "Sierra Wireless, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2023, 11:15 am by Joshua Weisenfeld
Background Sierra Wireless, along with several other defendants, filed petitions seeking inter partes review of U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm by Alex Gasser
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: • Acer Inc. of Taiwan • Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California • Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington • Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York • Garmin Ltd. of Switzerland • Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas • Garmin USA, Inc.… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
The other companies involved in the investigation include Acer Inc., Barnes & Noble, Garmin Ltd., HTC Corp., Huawei Technologies Co., Kyocera Corp., Novatel Wireless Inc., Sierra Wireless Inc. and ZTE Corp. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
The other companies involved in the investigation include Acer Inc., Barnes & Noble, Garmin Ltd., HTC Corp., Huawei Technologies Co., Kyocera Corp., Novatel Wireless Inc., Sierra Wireless Inc. and ZTE Corp. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
The other companies involved in the investigation include Acer Inc., Barnes & Noble, Garmin Ltd., HTC Corp., Huawei Technologies Co., Kyocera Corp., Novatel Wireless Inc., Sierra Wireless Inc. and ZTE Corp. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:05 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent No. 5,809,336 (the ‘336 patent): Acer Inc. of Taiwan Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York Garmin Ltd. of Switzerland Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas Garmin USA, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America of Bellevue, Washington Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. of China Huawei North America of Plano, Texas Kyocera… [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 1:52 am by Florian Mueller
Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Sierra Wireless, and u-blox, Inc. to the FCC in the same context.Two of those organizations have recently been criticized for astroturfing (pretending to represent the interests of parties other than the ones who actually pay and control them):In September, Bloomberg reported that ACT, which claims to represent small app developers and IoT device makers, receives most of its funding and takes directions from Apple.Shortly thereafter,… [read post]